You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 Respondents’ attitudes towards use of hazardous chemicals

From: Chemical risk and safety awareness, perception, and practices among research laboratories workers in Italy

ATTITUDESN (%)N (%)N (%)
 Unsafe
(score 1–4)
Somewhat safe
(score 5–7)
Safe
(score 8–10)
Perception of a safe workplace a51 (21.5)90 (38)96 (40.5)
Factors contributing to risk of injury b:Not much
(score 1–4)
Enough
(score 5–7)
Much
(score 8–10)
high workload25 (10.6)67 (28.2)145 (61.2)
inexperience11 (4.6)34 (14.4)192 (81)
inadequate training in safe handling of chemicals6 (2.5)39 (16.5)192 (81)
Perception of having received an adequate training regarding c:Inadequate
(score 1–2)
Just adequate
(score 3)
Totally adequate
(score 4–5)
interpretation of the safety data sheet46 (19.4)54 (22.8)137 (57.8)
management of accidents and first aid57 (24)76 (32.1)104 (43.9)
decontamination procedures in case of accidental spillage of hazardous chemicals73 (30.8)82 (34.6)82 (34.6)
use of PPE32 (13.5)64 (27)141 (59.5)
Perception of exposure tod:Not exposed
(score 1–2)
Moderately exposed
(score 3)
Very exposed (score 4–5)
biological risk94 (39.7)49 (20.6)94 (39.7)
chemical risk38 (16)70 (29.6)129 (54.4)
ionizing radiations risk178 (75.1)40 (16.9)19 (8)
environmental risk136 (57.4)49 (20.7)52 (21.9)
work-related stress risk, ergonomic factors risk73 (30.8)59 (24.9)105 (44.3)
Perception of safety related to occupational activity and colleagues: Strongly disagree or DisagreeUncertainStrongly agree or Agree
Exposure to cancerogenic chemicals is extremely low123 (51.9)31 (13.1)83 (35)
Safety measures protect from unwanted effects related to exposure to chemicals80 (33.7)30 (12.7)127 (53.6)
Proper interpretation of label of all hazardous chemicals can prevent laboratory injuries4 (1.7)9 (3.8)224 (94.5)
Proper PPE are available52 (21.9)40 (16.9)145 (61.2)
My laboratory colleagues handle chemicals following safety procedures52 (21.9)44 (18.6)141 (59.5)
  1. a 10-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 for “totally unsafe” to 10 “totally safe”
  2. b10-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 for “not much” to 10 “very much”
  3. c 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 for “not at all adequate” to 5 for “completely adequate”
  4. d 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 for “not at all exposed” to 5 for “very much exposed”
\